MagentaHR
CONSULTING

Workplace investigations

Need an investigation? It has to be fair, and seen to be fair.

An investigation that looks biased is worse than no investigation at all.

Something has been alleged, a grievance, misconduct, bullying or harassment, and it needs to be looked into properly. If you're too close to the people involved, an independent investigator protects both the outcome and the business.

Supporting owner-managed businesses across Oxfordshire, Wiltshire, Berkshire and the UK.

Wondering what this costs? See how it works and pricing →

★★★★★ 5.0 from 17 Google reviews · FCIPD Chartered Fellow

Written and reviewed by Samantha Newton FCIPD, Chartered Fellow CIPD · 25+ years' employee relations experience · Last reviewed June 2026

At a glance

What it is
Impartial fact-finding before a grievance or disciplinary decision.
Main risk
A biased or incomplete investigation collapsing the whole process.
First step
Agree a clear, written scope.
Typical timescale
Usually a matter of weeks.

You need the facts, and you need the process to stand up.

An allegation has been made. It might be one employee against another, a formal grievance, or a suspicion of misconduct. Either way, you can't act on it until you genuinely know what happened.

The problem is that in a small business, you usually know everyone involved. That makes it very hard to investigate credibly yourself. If the people involved, or a tribunal, believe the investigation was biased, the whole process collapses, however serious the conduct.

A proper investigation establishes the facts fairly, gives everyone a chance to be heard, and produces a documented report you can actually rely on to make a decision.

Typical situations supported

If any of these sound familiar, you're in the right place.

A grievance that needs investigating before it can be heard
An allegation of bullying or harassment
Suspected misconduct that needs the facts established first
A complaint where you're too close to the people involved to be impartial
A situation where a previous internal investigation has been challenged as unfair
An allegation involving a manager or senior person
A suspected financial or expenses irregularity
Any situation where you need a defensible record before you act

Not sure how serious yours is?

Get a clear, honest read in about 3 minutes. Free, confidential, no login.

Check your situation →

Where workplace investigations go wrong for employers

Most investigations fail not on the conclusion but on how they were run. The common mistakes are predictable and avoidable:

!

The investigator is too close to one or both parties to be seen as fair

!

Conclusions are reached before all the evidence is gathered

!

One side is interviewed properly and the other is not

!

The scope drifts, turning a single allegation into a fishing exercise

!

Findings aren't properly documented, so they can't be relied on later

!

Confidentiality slips, and the process is tainted by gossip

Key point

A flawed investigation doesn't just fail to resolve the issue. It actively creates new legal risk for the business.

What's at stake

What's actually at risk

An investigation sits underneath almost every serious employment decision. If it's weak, everything built on top of it is weak too.

  • A grievance or disciplinary outcome that can't be defended because the investigation behind it was unfair
  • Discrimination, harassment or constructive dismissal claims if a complaint is seen to have been brushed aside
  • A breakdown in trust across the team if people feel the process wasn't even-handed
  • Decisions that have to be unwound because the fact-finding was incomplete

Tribunals look closely at whether an investigation was fair, thorough and impartial. A sound, independent investigation is often what makes the difference between a decision that holds and one that's overturned.

The process

How an investigation works

A clear, fair process is what protects you at every stage. Here's how it runs, and where Samantha guides you through it.

  1. 1

    Scope

    Agree exactly what is, and isn't, being investigated.

  2. 2

    Evidence

    Gather documents and relevant information.

  3. 3

    Interviews

    Hear all sides fairly and on the record.

  4. 4

    Test

    Weigh the evidence objectively, not against assumptions.

  5. 5

    Report

    Produce clear, documented findings you can act on.

How Magenta HR helps

Samantha acts as a genuinely independent investigator, someone outside the relationships involved, who can establish the facts fairly and produce findings you can rely on:

An impartial investigation, run by someone with no stake in the outcome

A clear, agreed scope so the process stays focused and fair

Fair interviews with everyone involved, properly recorded

Evidence tested objectively, not against assumptions

A clear, documented findings report you can act on with confidence

Guidance on what the findings mean for your next step

You get a fair process and a defensible outcome, handled by a Chartered Fellow of the CIPD with 25+ years' experience of exactly these situations.

How I work

The Magenta Method

A clear, four-step approach so you always know where you stand and what happens next.

1

Understand

We get a clear, honest picture of what's really going on, beneath the surface.

2

Assess the risk

Your legal exposure and commercial impact, explained in plain English.

3

Plan the right path

Realistic options and the correct steps, in order, written up within 48 hours.

4

Resolve & protect

Support through it, then keep you protected so the next issue is caught early.

Real situation · anonymised

Workplace investigations

A harassment complaint resolved through independent investigation

One employee accused another. The owner was too close to both.

Situation

A complaint was made by one employee against another, alleging harassment. The owner knew and liked both people and could not credibly investigate it themselves.

What changed

An independent investigation was run from outside the relationships involved: evidence gathered, both parties interviewed fairly, and the allegations tested objectively against what could be evidenced.

Outcome

The complaint was resolved through a fair process the business could stand behind, with a clear, documented outcome that protected the business.

Owner, owner-managed business

Samantha Newton FCIPD

Reviewed by Samantha Newton FCIPD, Chartered Fellow of the CIPD, with 25+ years handling situations like this.

Common questions

Why can't I just investigate it myself?+

You can, if you can genuinely be impartial and be seen to be impartial. In a small business that's often impossible, because you know everyone involved. An independent investigator removes any suggestion of bias, which is exactly what protects the outcome if it's ever challenged.

What does an independent investigation actually involve?+

Agreeing a clear scope, gathering relevant evidence, interviewing the people involved fairly, testing the allegations objectively, and producing a documented findings report. The investigation establishes the facts; you still make the final decision.

Does the investigator make the decision?+

No. The investigator establishes the facts and reports the findings. The decision on any outcome remains with you, the employer. Keeping those two roles separate is part of what makes the process fair.

How long does an investigation take?+

It depends on the complexity and the number of people involved, but a focused investigation is usually a matter of weeks, not months. Dragging it out is unfair to everyone, so the aim is to be thorough and prompt.

Do I have to investigate before a disciplinary or grievance?+

In almost all cases, yes. You need to establish the facts before any formal hearing. Skipping or rushing the investigation is one of the most common reasons employers lose tribunal claims.

What if the investigation clears the person?+

That's a legitimate and important outcome. A fair investigation protects the accused as much as the complainant. A documented finding either way is what lets you move forward properly.

More common questions from business owners → FAQ page

Ready to sort this out

Get a clear, honest read on your situation

Start with the free Situation Check to understand exactly what you're dealing with, or book a free consultation and talk it through with Samantha directly.

You deal directly with Samantha, no call centre, no junior, and if you can handle it yourself, she'll tell you. Getting it wrong can run to five figures; a focused session starts from £495 + VAT, with a written plan in 48 hours.

Free and no obligation · Replies within one working day · Referred by accountants and solicitors.

You might also be dealing with

These situations often come up alongside each other.